Monday, March 28, 2011

the difference between dogs and hounds

“You have to try it, Lilli,” Kim said. “It’s so much fun!”

Famous last words, I thought. Kim, Tamara, and I were at a horse show in southern Illinois, and some people we met at the show invited us to go fox hunting with them the next day. Kim and Tamara were all for it. I was less sure. I was tired, ready to go home, and afraid that my horse would trip on a log and break his leg. But, weak-willed as I am, I caved, and on Sunday morning we headed over to the property of the foxhunters.

There we met several other riders and six pair of dogs, and I was instructed in the ways of fox hunting. First, I learned that the dogs were not dogs. They were “hounds,” and calling them “dogs” was an insult to their houndliness. Second, I learned that the dogs – excuse me, hounds – always had the right of way. Third, I was told, always stay behind the master of fox hounds.

Finally we headed out. The property we rode on was a mix of forest and cornfields. The dead stalks from last season were still sticking out of the ground, and they crackled as the horses stepped over them. We went slowly at first, as we waited for the hounds to pick up a trail. On the way, I learned a little more about hunting from Tom, the master of fox hounds. Apparently, there were few foxes in southern Illinois, so the hounds usually caught the scent of a coyote. The foxes and coyotes were very quick, and this pack of hounds had never caught one, but Tom didn’t seem to find that particularly disappointing. “It’s just for fun,” he said. “If we killed the coyotes, we would have nothing left to chase.”

Then the hounds started baying, and we took off, trotting and galloping madly through trees, streams, and corn. I didn’t know how long we had been charging through the woods – five minutes? ten? – but I didn’t particularly care because it was fun. I wondered how I had managed to live for seventeen years without experiencing this wild hunt.

Then we cantered into a field, and I saw it – a coyote nimbly loping through the corn stalks. Tom told us to stop, and we waited for the hounds to catch up as we watched the coyote. It disappeared into a valley in the land, reappeared, and then vanished over the crest of the next hill. The hounds were about thirty seconds behind.

I remembered what Tom had said earlier – the foxes and coyotes are too clever; the hounds never catch them. It was clear to me in this instance that the hounds would never get this particular coyote. But if they did? Maybe not today, or tomorrow, but someday? How would I feel about that? I tried to picture the hounds chasing Sheba, my big brindled rescue dog of indeterminate breeding, and I couldn’t find a way to make that image fit. Yes, the hounds were chasing a coyote, not a family pet, and yes, coyotes and foxes were historically pests, which is why foxhunting became a sport, but they were all just dogs, basically. And it just felt so wrong for dogs to be hunting other dogs.

The hunt ended, finally, and the coyotes and foxes were no longer threatened by six pair of hounds and nine people on horses. We meandered back to the barn, Isaiah sweaty and breathing hard, me still exhilarated by our wild gallops. I knew then that I would go fox hunting again, because a horseperson, especially one stuck in limbo in her senior year, trying to move forward while the establishment says not yet, first you need to graduate, first you need to get good grades and follow all the rules, will take whatever excuse she can get to dash madly through cornfields and trees and brush. But I also knew that I wouldn’t forget the picture I’d conjured up of a pack of hounds chasing my terrified Sheba through the brush. And I knew that fox hunting would never again be as thrilling as it was that first time.

6 comments:

  1. This sounds like a very interesting experience; I can imagine that dashing through a forest on horseback is very exhilarating, but the whole concept of tracking down animals to kill them for sport is a little creepy. So I am glad that the coyotes usually get away.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pearsony--I would like to note that dogs are members of the subspecies Canis lupus familiaris, descended, presumably directly, from the grey wolf. Foxes and coyotes are members of the separate species Canis vulpus and Canis latrans respectively. Interestingly, coyotes are an almost completely North American line of canids, along with that extinct one, while greys are Eurasian in descent. I suppose, though, that you could argue that coyotes are an extremely diverse group, some even with grey and dog blood. From this reason, I suspect, came the suggestion that they be renamed "Canis soupus", as they are a proverbial "soup" of canine species. We have, alas, been quite beaten in the integration of the ideal of the Great American Melting Pot. We're even the same species. /That/'s what I call integration.

    Anyway, I have to say that the death of anything during such an activity would be extremely sad indeed. And yet, do you know how much emotional trauma those poor foxes must have been forced through by your and Ezekiel's (yes, I know) swift pursuit? They're going to therapy for the remainders of their lives, the poor souls. Gallop sans sport! Hounds are silly anyway (I'm kidding. Sort of).

    And while I intimately aware of my dog's being quite something fantastic indeed, I will concede that Sheba is perfectly wonderful herself. Except that the biblical Sheba totally got his head cut off.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You tell this story well, conveying both the excitement of the chase and your ambivalence about the outing.

    I could never understand the appeal of hunting 'til I read Michael Pollan's account of hunting wild boars in The Omnivore's Dilemma. But fox hunting sounds different (and possibly more fun, since you're chasing around on horseback).

    ReplyDelete
  4. P.S. Even though I now understand what the appeal of hunting might be, I would still never be able to shoot an animal myself.

    I didn't realize that fox hunting didn't involve guns. It makes sense that it wouldn't, since there would be a lot of accidental fatalities in any activity that involved groups of people on horseback holding guns. Yipes. (But in away, it's more brutal without the guns, in situations where the fox actually gets caught.)

    Very interesting post!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well-told and enjoyable story :)

    I was surprised that when asked to go hunting you were game (hehe). Seriously though...running around on horseback through the woods is great, but do you have to be pursuing prey to get a rush?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Humorous and well-wrought post, as usual.

    I would like to add my voice to the compendium of those crying for sans-foxes galumphing. However, there is something about chasing that is incredibly exciting-- isn't that what many of our lives are, or are developing into, in a sense? Some goal, some ideal, some way of living, a life-pursuit whose physical manifestation can be observed in the joy we find through unbridled chasing.

    But I'm being entirely over-dramatic here, and it's really just our primal natures and instincts. I would suggest, as a civilized human of the 21st century, that you remove the foxes and hounds and instead play a game of tag using polo sticks (padded, naturally).

    ReplyDelete